MV.tech services

Blockchain data engineering and on-chain analytics.

Turn blockchain activity into data your analysts and finance teams can work with. MV.tech builds pipelines that collect, decode and organise transactions across networks, then connect the results to warehouses, dashboards and reconciliation workflows.

  • Remote from Ahmedabad, India
  • Overlap with your timezone
  • Senior specialists, direct access
  • Scope agreed in writing

The starting point

Connect on-chain activity to business reporting.

  • Bring wallet and transaction activity from multiple networks into a common reporting model.
  • Explain token movements, fees and rewards using traceable transaction records.
  • Combine on-chain datasets with reference data and internal classifications.

What we deliver

From raw transactions to reporting and reconciliation.

01

Multi-chain data ingestion

Collect transactions, logs and events from node RPCs, APIs and available datasets. Define block ranges, incremental loading, backfills and source-specific handling for the networks in scope.

02

Decoding and normalisation

Decode supported contract events using ABIs and Web3.py. Standardise identifiers, wallet activity and transaction categories while retaining raw records for investigation.

03

Valuation and reconciliation datasets

Combine token and FX reference data with transaction records where suitable sources exist. Model transfers, fees and rewards, document valuation gaps and compare on-chain activity with internal records.

04

Dashboards and auditability

Publish warehouse tables and reporting views for wallet analysis and finance review. Keep corrections separate from immutable base data so users can trace adjustments back to the original record.

  • Python
  • Web3.py
  • Contract ABIs
  • BigQuery
  • Node RPCs
  • Ethereum
  • Bitcoin
  • Immutable X
  • Immutable zkEVM
  • XDC
  • WEMIX
  • Tezos
  • Cardano
  • Pandas
  • Parquet
  • SQL
  • Docker
  • Looker Studio

Business applications

Where this service fits.

  • Treasury and wallet reporting. Consolidated activity across wallets and networks, with transaction-level drill-down.
  • Token and reward reconciliation. Datasets for comparing transfers, staking rewards and fees with internal reporting records.
  • Blockchain product analytics. Data pipelines and reporting layers for teams building or operating on-chain products.

Engagement scope

Agree the networks, wallets and reporting rules.

An engagement starts with the business questions, networks and wallet or contract coverage. We review source availability, transaction types and valuation requirements, then define the data model and reconciliation approach. Ambiguous transactions and missing reference prices are recorded for review.

See our delivery process

Working together

How we deliver this work.

  1. 01

    Define the reporting scope

    Agree networks, wallets, contracts, history and the financial or analytical questions to answer.

  2. 02

    Ingest and model

    Build the collection and decoding pipeline, retaining raw transactions and traceable transformations.

  3. 03

    Reconcile and publish

    Compare the results with available records and release documented datasets, reports and correction procedures.

Teams our engineers have worked with

  • Google
  • Volvo
  • BCW
  • RootstockLabs
  • Chainlabs
  • Toptal
  • Turing

Before we begin

Questions buyers ask about blockchain data analytics

Not answered here? Ask us directly or read the full FAQ.

Why not just use a public chain dataset?

Public datasets are a reasonable starting point for common chains and standard token transfers. They tend to fall short on newer or smaller networks, on contracts whose events are not standard, and on the business layer: your token registry, your categorisation rules, your reporting currency and your reconciliation against internal records. We use public datasets where they fit and build ingestion where they do not.

How do you handle a contract with no published ABI?

Several ways, in order of preference: a verified ABI from the explorer, a standard interface the contract conforms to, an ABI supplied by whoever deployed it, or reconstruction from method signatures and observed event topics. Whichever route is used, the decoding rules are recorded per contract and the raw input data is retained, so decoding can be corrected and replayed without re-ingesting the chain.

Can analysts correct a figure without breaking the audit trail?

That is what the override layer is for. Base tables hold what the chain reported and are never edited. Corrections, whitelists and manual classifications live in separate tables with an author, a timestamp and a reason, and are applied when the reporting view is built. Both the original and the adjusted figure stay available, which is usually what an auditor asks to see.

How do you value tokens that barely trade?

Carefully, and visibly. The valuation method is a documented rule per token: reference price at block timestamp, a defined source hierarchy, a fallback, or explicitly no valuation at all. Unvalued volume is reported rather than hidden. It is better for a finance team to see that a share of activity has no reliable price than to receive a confident number built on a thin market.

Can this feed our existing warehouse and dashboards?

Yes. On-chain data is just another source: it lands in the same layered warehouse, under the same validation and modelling standards, and is read by Power BI, Looker Studio, Tableau or a Streamlit tool alongside everything else. Teams usually want it joined to off-chain records — customers, internal accounts, fiat movements — and that join is where most of the analytical value appears.

How much does blockchain data analytics consulting cost?

We quote after a scoping call, once the networks, contracts and wallets in scope, the reporting currency and period, and the figures the output has to reconcile against are agreed. A useful first project is a single chain and one business question built the whole way through, from ingestion and decoding to a reconciled output. MV.tech is a remote-first team based in Ahmedabad, India, with working hours planned around your timezone and a lean model that avoids large-consultancy overhead.

How do you reconcile staking rewards against on-chain and internal records?

We build a reward ledger per validator, delegator or wallet and reconcile it against on-chain distributions and internal records, with period totals, accrual timing and a discrepancy report. Base tables hold exactly what the chain reported and are never edited; corrections live in a separate override layer with an author, a timestamp and a reason, so both the original and adjusted figures stay available.

Your next step

Discuss your blockchain data requirements.

Tell us about the work, your current systems and the people who will use the result. We’ll discuss the requirements, delivery options and what an engagement would include.

Book a 30-minute call Email your brief contact@mvtech.solutions

Remote from Ahmedabad, India · Overlap with any timezone · No obligation